Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The appellant relied on the Delhi High Court's judgment in Kusum Health Care Pvt. Ltd., which held that once working capital adjustment is granted, there is no need to impute interest on outstanding receivables at year-end as it gets subsumed in the working capital adjustment. The Tribunal agreed with this proposition but directed the TPO to examine the bills and ascertain whether interest should be imputed on bills realized after the credit period of 70 days. The High Court modified the order, directing the TPO to look into the entire aspect in light of the Kusum Health Care judgment and pass orders accordingly, without imputing interest on the bills.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
