Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Two assessment orders were issued against a husband and wife, adding their entire claimed agricultural income to their taxable income due to failure to substantiate it. The petitioners provided additional documents like purchase bills, bank statements to support the agricultural income claim. The court quashed the assessment and penalty orders u/ss 270A and 271AAC(1), allowing the petitioners to produce documents before the assessing officer for fresh assessment. However, as the petitioners failed to respond to notices u/s 142(1), they were directed to pay a penalty of Rs. 40,000 each within two weeks as a precondition for fresh assessment.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
