Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The CPC correctly processed the return of income u/s 143(1)(a)(ii) read with Explanation (a)(i) and (a)(ii). The assessee failed to report agricultural income of Rs. 1,15,69,580 as exempt in Schedule-EI. Despite a proposed adjustment communication, the assessee did not respond within 30 days. The CPC was justified in making the adjustment as the claim was inconsistent with the return. Rectification u/s 154 is not obligatory if clear data is unavailable, relying on Anchor Processing Pvt. Ltd. The assessee did not revise the return u/s 139(5). The appeal against the section 154 order has a narrow scope, precluding merit examination. The assessee conceded the mistake before CIT(A), leaving no arguable case. No patent error amenable for rectification exists, warranting dismissal of all grounds raised.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
