Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of In a limited scrutiny assessment under CASS, the Assessing Officer made additions to the assessee's income on account of cash deposits, excess closing cash balance over opening balance and net income, and unexplained debtors balance. The CIT(A) partly allowed relief. The ITAT dismissed the assessee's appeal, confirming the CIT(A)'s action, as the assessee failed to substantiate or produce documentary evidence to controvert the CIT(A)'s findings during the appellate proceedings before the Tribunal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
