Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Petitioner argued non-receipt of notices preceding impugned assessment orders. Partnership firm discontinued business, carried on by proprietor. Court held petitioner neglected intimating firm's dissolution, surrendering PAN. Transactions made from firm's account despite alleged proprietorship. Returns filed from firm's address. Huge transactions observed. Respondent rightfully passed order u/s 144 read with 147 due to non-reply. Petitioner individually assessed requiring detailed consideration. Court quashed impugned orders, treating them as addenda to show-cause notices. Petitioner to pre-deposit Rs. 50,00,000 within eight weeks to Income Tax Department. Opportunity granted to file reply.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
