Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Liquidated damages provision was disallowed as it was based on unascertained liability without probability of outflow of resources. ITAT deleted addition, holding provision arose from contractual obligation and estimation basis was reasonable based on past experience. Warranty provision at 2% of turnover based on past experience was appropriate, fulfilling accrual and matching concepts, unlike accounting expense in year incurred or on claim by customer. TPO's rectification enhancing income was void ab initio for lack of opportunity to assessee before enhancement u/s 154(3). ITAT's conclusion that services provided by AE were not stewardship services upheld. Questions 2.5 and 2.6 to be re-notified on 07.03.2024 for submissions.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
