1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Liquidated damages provision was disallowed as it was based on unascertained liability without probability of outflow of resources. ITAT deleted addition, holding provision arose from contractual obligation and estimation basis was reasonable based on past experience. Warranty provision at 2% of turnover based on past experience was appropriate, fulfilling accrual and matching concepts, unlike accounting expense in year incurred or on claim by customer. TPO's rectification enhancing income was void ab initio for lack of opportunity to assessee before enhancement u/s 154(3). ITAT's conclusion that services provided by AE were not stewardship services upheld. Questions 2.5 and 2.6 to be re-notified on 07.03.2024 for submissions.