Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Assessee failed to file return of income u/s 139 but received notice u/s 148. Despite opting for presumptive taxation scheme u/s 44AD, which does not require maintaining books of accounts, assessee was liable to maintain books as stipulated u/s 44AA. Assessee cannot claim benefit of not complying with Section 68 regarding unexplained cash deposits in bank account. Assessee was required to explain sources, genuineness, and creditors' creditworthiness regarding cash deposits as per Section 68. Failing to do so, authorities rightly invoked Section 68 and added cash deposits as assessee's income under its deeming fiction. Case laws relied upon by assessee were decided on their own facts and inapplicable. Assessee's appeal dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
