Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Necessity of establishing nexus between expenditure incurred and earning of exempt income u/s 14A read with Rule 8D. Mechanical application of Rule 8D without recording requisite satisfaction violates procedural requirement u/s 14A(2). Disallowance restricted to exempt income earned. Deletion of addition for bogus long-term capital loss upheld due to lack of substantial evidence and failure to provide opportunity for cross-verification. Addition of speculation loss claimed under 'income from other sources' dismissed as it represented depreciation related to speculation business, properly accounted for with nullifying effect on returned income. Procedural lapses by Assessing Officer noted.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
