Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed additions from unsecured loans and capital introduced by the assessee during demonetization. The Assessing Officer failed to make inquiries regarding the same, rendering the addition unsustainable. The assessee claimed consideration from jewelry sales, declared as taxable capital gains, and past savings for capital introduced in the proprietary concern. The creditworthiness was proved, and cash deposits from business receipts cannot be concluded as loans. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleted an amount regarding a cheque transaction after examining purchase bills, confirmations, and Income Tax Returns. The assessee provided cash books, sales and purchase books, expense ledgers, loan confirmations, and stock registers. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal and dismissed the revenue's appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
