Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The High Court addressed the issue of whether a sale agreement made after the commencement of a company's winding up is affected by Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the winding up commences at the presentation of the petition and any disposition of company property after that is void unless the court orders otherwise. The court emphasized that the jurisdiction is equitable and should prevent unjust enrichment by the company. Referring to a Supreme Court case, the court noted that the term 'void' in Section 536(2) does not always imply complete nullity, but rather voidable. The Applicant had conducted due diligence, paid consideration, settled dues, and obtained necessary permissions, making the transaction bonafide, fair, and just. Therefore, the court ratified the sale agreement, protecting the transaction.