Faceless assessment and registration procedures are updated through electronic communication, revised recovery rules, extended deadlines, and replacem...
Risk-based selective vessel boarding requires accurate declarations and preserves master and agent liability where physical inspections are not select...
Permanent-establishment reassessment cannot revisit scrutinised disclosures; extended reopening fails without undisclosed material facts and within st...
The High Court examined whether a supply was a composite supply u/s 8(a) of the CGST Act/JGST Act or a mixed supply u/s 8(b). The supply involved transportation of Power Plant Ash within 50 km, taxed under various headings. The Court found a prima facie case of abuse of process of law and lack of jurisdiction. It held that the extended period of limitation u/s 74 is not applicable in cases involving interpretation issues, citing relevant case law. A previous Delhi High Court judgment under the old Service Tax regime was distinguished. The Court deemed the writ application maintainable and scheduled further hearing for July 16, 2024, noting that denying the petitioner an alternative remedy would be unjust.
The High Court examined whether a supply was a composite supply u/s 8(a) of the CGST Act/JGST Act or a mixed supply u/s 8(b). The supply involved transportation of Power Plant Ash within 50 km, taxed under various headings. The Court found a prima facie case of abuse of process of law and lack of jurisdiction. It held that the extended period of limitation u/s 74 is not applicable in cases involving interpretation issues, citing relevant case law. A previous Delhi High Court judgment under the old Service Tax regime was distinguished. The Court deemed the writ application maintainable and scheduled further hearing for July 16, 2024, noting that denying the petitioner an alternative remedy would be unjust.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
