Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The High Court considered the validity of reassessment orders u/s 148A(d) where reasons differed from those in notices u/s 148A(b). The primary issue was the taxability of buyout amount and interest on fixed deposit. The Court held that notices u/s 148A(b) must contain reasons for the assessee to respond effectively. Failure to disclose reasons renders the notice ineffective. The Court noted the importance of Section 148A enquiry before issuing notice u/s 148. Orders u/s 148A(d) were deemed as notices u/s 148A(b), requiring appellants to submit objections within six weeks. Any objections would be considered, and orders passed within six weeks after a hearing.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
