Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to restrict TP adjustment on guarantee commission to 0.2% for one financial year, finding TPO's 0.77% adjustment unjustified. The ITAT also supported CIT(A)'s deletion of 0.25% mark-up without basis. Regarding ESOP expenses, ITAT agreed with CIT(A) that discount on ESOP shares was deductible u/s 37(1) as it was not a capital expenditure. Disallowance u/s 14A was rejected as no exempt income was earned, following precedents that disallowance cannot exceed exempt income. Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
