Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
The High Court examined the constitutionality of u/s 16(2)(c) and 16(4) of the CGST/SGST Act regarding Input Tax Credit (ITC) restrictions. The Court held that the legislation was valid as it falls u/s Article 246A and serves public purposes. The claim for ITC is a concession, not an absolute right, subject to statutory conditions. The restrictions on ITC time limits were deemed necessary for revenue balance. The Court rejected challenges to the constitutionality of the sections, emphasizing the importance of statutory restrictions. The Court granted partial relief for 2017-18 and 2018-19, allowing for the refund of unutilized ITC and extending the time limit for filing annual returns.