TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The High Court considered a petition for provisional winding up of a company u/s 450 of the Companies Act, 1956. The key issue was whether the petition should be admitted for liquidation due to alleged fraudulent activities. The court noted that fraudulent activities, such as misappropriation of funds, could warrant winding up. The respondents vaguely defended against the allegations, mentioning past irregularities of the appellant without clarifying their relevance. The court emphasized that winding up may be justified if the company's affairs are conducted unfairly or prejudicially to shareholders. Both parties were directed to provide material information to support their contentions. The court highlighted the need for a thorough examination of the company's circumstances and potential alternative solutions before making a winding up decision.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
