Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The High Court addressed the issue of liability to pay GST based on a Board resolution. The Court found that the agreement's scope of work included all taxes, so the contractor cannot claim additional GST. The government's reduction of GST on works contracts balanced pre and post-GST taxes. The petitioner was required to execute a supplemental agreement at a reduced value. The effective date of GST was considered, and the petitioner failed to provide evidence of paying GST or claiming input tax credit. Due to the arbitration clause in the agreement, the Court could not issue the direction sought in the writ petition. The petitioner was given the option to invoke arbitration within four weeks. The Writ Petition was disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
