Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
The ITAT Chandigarh dealt with a case involving revision u/s 263 on interest income from fixed deposits. The tribunal held that AO correctly allowed deduction u/s 80P, rejecting PCIT's revision. Citing precedents, it affirmed that interest from cooperative banks is eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d). The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside PCIT's revisionary order and reinstating the assessment order. The decision emphasized the eligibility of cooperative societies for exemption under section 80P(2)(d) for interest income from investments in cooperative banks.