Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of CESTAT Chennai addressed misdeclaration of imported goods 'I-MAS POs-Nickel Compound' and appropriate classification under CTH. Tribunal held goods are classifiable u/s 38249900, not u/s 28254000. Appellant's claim for Customs Notification benefits denied due to mismatch in product description. Advance Rulings are binding on applicant and field formation. Non-compliance with Pre-notice Consultation Regulations noted, but no prejudice caused to appellant. Confiscation, fine, and penalty set aside due to lack of malafide intent. Demand of duty confirmed, but penalties waived. Appeal partly allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
