Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Special Package of Incentives - Imposition of cap on the total IPA allowable in respect of a unit based on Fixed Capital Investment - The Court held that the special package of incentives provided to ACL did not stipulate any overall financial cap based on FCI for the release of IPA. It was found that the package explicitly stated that IPA would be released without any financial cap, as outlined in the approval letter dated 02.03.2006. - The Court found that the State’s attempt to impose a financial cap retrospectively was mala fide and arbitrary. The Court reinforced the principle that contractual commitments made by the State under special packages should be honored, and any attempt to unilaterally alter such commitments is impermissible.
Special Package of Incentives - Imposition of cap on the total IPA allowable in respect of a unit based on Fixed Capital Investment - The Court held that the special package of incentives provided to ACL did not stipulate any overall financial cap based on FCI for the release of IPA. It was found that the package explicitly stated that IPA would be released without any financial cap, as outlined in the approval letter dated 02.03.2006. - The Court found that the State’s attempt to impose a financial cap retrospectively was mala fide and arbitrary. The Court reinforced the principle that contractual commitments made by the State under special packages should be honored, and any attempt to unilaterally alter such commitments is impermissible.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.