Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Penalty u/s 271C - failure to deduct TDS u/s 194C on External Development Charges - The High court noted that the applicability of Section 194C had been explicitly raised in counter-affidavits, providing sufficient notice to the petitioners. Therefore, the court declined to interfere with the show-cause notices at this stage. - Regarding the treatment of the petitioners as an assessee-in-default and the imposition of penalties u/s 221 and 271C of the Act, the court observed that such penalties were not inevitable consequences of default. - In this case, the court found that there was a genuine and bona fide legal issue surrounding the applicability of Section 194C to the supplementary commission. Therefore, the court quashed the penalty proceedings under Section 271C.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
