Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Recovery of differential duty (SAD) u/s 28(1) of CA for the imports made in all the Bills of Entry along with interest and penalties - The Tribunal confirmed the misdeclaration of goods and found the importer's actions led to the evasion of customs duties. - It was determined that claiming exemptions under false pretenses without fulfilling the necessary VAT payments constituted evasion of SAD. - The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed on the appellants, stating their involvement and awareness of the transactions and misdeclarations were evident, directly implicating them in the customs duty evasion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.