Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
Validity of Reopening of assessment - proceedings drawn u/s 148A commenced by the local jurisdictional officer - non adherence to procedure of faceless regime for the purposes of governing the assessment under the Income Tax Act - The High court examined the provisions of Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, which mandates faceless procedures for assessment, reassessment, or re-computation. It found that these procedures do not extend to the preliminary stages before assessment or reassessment. - Considering the absence of faceless procedures during the preliminary stages and the timing of the introduction of faceless assessment procedures, the court dismissed the petition, finding no illegality in the order passed under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act.
Validity of Reopening of assessment - proceedings drawn u/s 148A commenced by the local jurisdictional officer - non adherence to procedure of faceless regime for the purposes of governing the assessment under the Income Tax Act - The High court examined the provisions of Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, which mandates faceless procedures for assessment, reassessment, or re-computation. It found that these procedures do not extend to the preliminary stages before assessment or reassessment. - Considering the absence of faceless procedures during the preliminary stages and the timing of the introduction of faceless assessment procedures, the court dismissed the petition, finding no illegality in the order passed under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
