Penalty u/s. 271D - Failure to record any satisfaction for...
Tribunal Rules Penalty u/s 271D Invalid for Lack of Jurisdiction, Citing Supreme Court Precedent.
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Plus +
Source NTF
AI Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
https://www.taxtmi.com/hi...
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
ExpandCollapse
Income TaxFebruary 5, 2024Case LawsAT
Penalty u/s. 271D - Failure to record any satisfaction for initiating the said penalty proceedings by the A.O - Tribunal held that, the issue before us is no more resintegra in light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Jai Laxmi Rice Mills Ambala City [2023 (10) TMI 707 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT], therefore, in the backdrop of our aforesaid deliberations, the penalty imposed by the Jt.CIT u/s. 271D of the Act cannot be sustained and is liable to be struck down for want of valid assumption of jurisdiction.
Penalty u/s. 271D - Failure to record any satisfaction for initiating the said penalty proceedings by the A.O - Tribunal held that, the issue before us is no more resintegra in light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Jai Laxmi Rice Mills Ambala City [2023 (10) TMI 707 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT], therefore, in the backdrop of our aforesaid deliberations, the penalty imposed by the Jt.CIT u/s. 271D of the Act cannot be sustained and is liable to be struck down for want of valid assumption of jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick
reference only.
TaxTMI 
https://www.taxtmi.com/hi...
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
