Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Capital gain - transfer u/s 2(47) - unregistered JD agreement - appellant had not received any consideration - since an unregistered agreement involving the transfer of possession of an immovable property would not qualify as a contract of the nature referred to u/s 53A of the TP Act, no transfer could be presumed based upon an unregistered agreement. - In order to qualify as a transfer of a capital asset under Section 2(47)(v) of the IT Act, there must be a contract that could be enforced in law under Section 53A of the TP Act. - HC
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
