Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Validity of assessment notice u/s 46 of WBVAT Act - carry forward of excess ITC to next FY - The rule of ejusdem generis is inapplicable to the case on hand as Section 46 (1) (b) does not contain enumeration of specific words; the circumstance enumerated in clause (b) does not constitute a class or category; contingencies mentioned therein is not exhausted by enumeration; the general terms do not follow the enumeration and there is clear indication of a different legislative intent. - The words or “for any other reasons” should be given the widest meaning bearing in mind the scheme of the provisions of WBVAT - the notice was issued by respondent on the assessee are valid in law. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.