Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - assessee had wrongly shown the rental income as 'business income' - Even the pertinent fact on the file is that in the immediate preceding assessment year, the assessee had offered the same income as income from business and which was accepted by the AO under scrutiny assessment proceedings. Under the circumstances for the assessment year under consideration, the assessee can safely be said to be having bonafide belief for offering the same under the same head i.e. 'income from business or profession'. - No penalty - AT
Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - assessee had wrongly shown the rental income as 'business income' - Even the pertinent fact on the file is that in the immediate preceding assessment year, the assessee had offered the same income as income from business and which was accepted by the AO under scrutiny assessment proceedings. Under the circumstances for the assessment year under consideration, the assessee can safely be said to be having bonafide belief for offering the same under the same head i.e. 'income from business or profession'. - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
