Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - reopening of assessment u/s 147 - "reason to suspect" v/s 'reason to believe' - Information adverse may trigger "reason to suspect" and not 'reason to believe'. When an information adverse like this comes to the notice of the AO then it only triggers 'reason to suspect'. Then what the AO should have done was that he should have made reasonable enquiry and should have collected material which could make him believe that there is in fact escapement of income. - AT
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - reopening of assessment u/s 147 - "reason to suspect" v/s 'reason to believe' - Information adverse may trigger "reason to suspect" and not 'reason to believe'. When an information adverse like this comes to the notice of the AO then it only triggers 'reason to suspect'. Then what the AO should have done was that he should have made reasonable enquiry and should have collected material which could make him believe that there is in fact escapement of income. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.