Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Insolvency and BankruptcyNovember 10, 2021Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP - In the instant case, because of the fact that the advances made by the Appellant / Financial Creditor to the Corporate Debtor was supported by the ‘Irrevocable Undertaking for Recourse’ and as such, it is within its ambit to demand the repayment from the ‘Corporate Debtor’ etc. Added further, it cannot be forgotten that the invoices purchased and assigned to the Appellant / Financial Creditor/Petitioner were with ‘Recourse’ and that the said advances will squarely come within the definition of Section 5(8)(e) of the ‘I&B’ Code, 2016. - Order of rejection of application by the NCLT set aside - AT
Initiation of CIRP - In the instant case, because of the fact that the advances made by the Appellant / Financial Creditor to the Corporate Debtor was supported by the ‘Irrevocable Undertaking for Recourse’ and as such, it is within its ambit to demand the repayment from the ‘Corporate Debtor’ etc. Added further, it cannot be forgotten that the invoices purchased and assigned to the Appellant / Financial Creditor/Petitioner were with ‘Recourse’ and that the said advances will squarely come within the definition of Section 5(8)(e) of the ‘I&B’ Code, 2016. - Order of rejection of application by the NCLT set aside - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
