Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Dishonor of Cheque - rebuttal of presumption about the legally enforceable debt or not - the complainant, apart from existence of a presumption of a legally enforceable debt in his favour, could able to prove his case by leading cogent evidence, both oral and documentary, but the accused who failed to take any specific defence in the matter, could not even make out a case on preponderance of probabilities. - The courts have rightly convicted the accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act - HC
Dishonor of Cheque - rebuttal of presumption about the legally enforceable debt or not - the complainant, apart from existence of a presumption of a legally enforceable debt in his favour, could able to prove his case by leading cogent evidence, both oral and documentary, but the accused who failed to take any specific defence in the matter, could not even make out a case on preponderance of probabilities. - The courts have rightly convicted the accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.