Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Validity of the application filed u/s 245(C) - Settlement Commission - the prime consideration and pre-condition for entertaining an application is true and full disclosure of income and subsequent adding, deletion or insertion would dis-entitle the Settlement Commission from entertaining an application. - In the present case, the Settlement Commission exceeded its jurisdiction by settling the issues, even after filing of the additional statement of facts by the assessee on two occasions, providing further disclosure of income. - the Settlement has caused prejudice to the interest of the Revenue and therefore, regular assessment is to be made to cull out the truth and proceed with the matter in the manner known to law. - HC
Validity of the application filed u/s 245(C) - Settlement Commission - the prime consideration and pre-condition for entertaining an application is true and full disclosure of income and subsequent adding, deletion or insertion would dis-entitle the Settlement Commission from entertaining an application. - In the present case, the Settlement Commission exceeded its jurisdiction by settling the issues, even after filing of the additional statement of facts by the assessee on two occasions, providing further disclosure of income. - the Settlement has caused prejudice to the interest of the Revenue and therefore, regular assessment is to be made to cull out the truth and proceed with the matter in the manner known to law. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.