Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Validity of reassessment order made in the name of defunct company which has since merged with the petitioner - it would be absurd to hold that the order has been passed in the name of a defunct company to scuttle the re-assessment proceeding. Amalgamation cannot be used as a tool to defeat assessment and re-assessment proceedings as the sanctioned scheme of amalgamation itself takes care of such eventualities. It cannot be used to subvert assessment proceedings. - HC
Validity of reassessment order made in the name of defunct company which has since merged with the petitioner - it would be absurd to hold that the order has been passed in the name of a defunct company to scuttle the re-assessment proceeding. Amalgamation cannot be used as a tool to defeat assessment and re-assessment proceedings as the sanctioned scheme of amalgamation itself takes care of such eventualities. It cannot be used to subvert assessment proceedings. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.