Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Revision u/s 263 - the ld. PCIT had alleged that the ld. AO had not made any enquiry at all on the issue of long term borrowings and other current liabilities. It is not the case of the PCIT that the ld. AO had indeed made enquiries but he had not made requisite entries thereon - Hence, in our considered opinion, the ld. PCIT grossly erred in invoking revisionary jurisdiction which is against the settled legal principles and more so in the facts and circumstances of the instant case. - AT
Revision u/s 263 - the ld. PCIT had alleged that the ld. AO had not made any enquiry at all on the issue of long term borrowings and other current liabilities. It is not the case of the PCIT that the ld. AO had indeed made enquiries but he had not made requisite entries thereon - Hence, in our considered opinion, the ld. PCIT grossly erred in invoking revisionary jurisdiction which is against the settled legal principles and more so in the facts and circumstances of the instant case. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
