Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Penalty u/s 271D - violation of section 269SS - assessee had taken the cash loans from the close relatives i.e. sons-in-law whose spouses are partners and amounts taken as capital contribution but due to inadvertent mistake of the accountant the same was recorded as loans - all of them are assessed to income tax and submitted the confirmations - these aspect neither examined by the JCIT nor by CIT(A) by making cross verification - No penalty
Penalty u/s 271D - violation of section 269SS - assessee had taken the cash loans from the close relatives i.e. sons-in-law whose spouses are partners and amounts taken as capital contribution but due to inadvertent mistake of the accountant the same was recorded as loans - all of them are assessed to income tax and submitted the confirmations - these aspect neither examined by the JCIT nor by CIT(A) by making cross verification - No penalty
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
