Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - the appeal of the Assessee has not been disposed on merits. In view of this, there was no bar to the CIT in exercising jurisdiction u/s.264 - the embargo imposed in Sec. 264 that there should be no appeal pending before CIT(A) on the issues raised in the application u/s.264 is not applicable in the present case - AT
Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - the appeal of the Assessee has not been disposed on merits. In view of this, there was no bar to the CIT in exercising jurisdiction u/s.264 - the embargo imposed in Sec. 264 that there should be no appeal pending before CIT(A) on the issues raised in the application u/s.264 is not applicable in the present case - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
