Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Proposals for suo-moto audit or scrutiny under the HGST Act, 2017 must state clear, specific and duly justified reasons, supported by available records, intelligence inputs, data analysis or another verifiable information source. Each proposal must also specify the tentative quantum of tax evasion. The concerned DETC must first examine and recommend the proposal, after which the case file must be sent to the Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Range) for necessary approval. Field formations must comply strictly; suo-moto action initiated without this prescribed process will be viewed seriously.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.