Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Rejection of central sale

d.v. gupta

Case of my client selected for audit under DVAT act. The VATO insist on GR of goods sent outside the state. while we have form 31 of the party and payment received by cheque from the party. the party by own vehicle taken the goods outsid state. the VATO is going to reject the central sale. whether he is correct . please discuss.

VATO Challenges Central Sale Validity Due to Missing Goods Receipt; Client Argues Evidence Suffices Under DVAT Act A client is facing an audit under the DVAT Act, where the VAT Officer (VATO) is demanding a Goods Receipt (GR) for goods sent outside the state. The client has Form 31 and payment confirmation via cheque, but the goods were transported using their own vehicle, lacking a GR. The VATO plans to reject the central sale. A respondent believes the VATO's decision is incorrect, arguing that the available evidence should suffice to validate the central sale despite the absence of a GR. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues