Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Applicability of Service tax on rent income

KESHAV JAIPURIA

'A' have a residential property, and that property given on rent basis to a firm for the purpose of firm executive residence, 'A' taken that property as housing loan and pay EMI. 'A' received rent amounting to Rs.2,50,000/- P.M. Is 'A' charge service Tax on rent on that property?

Service Tax on Residential Property Rent: Key Issue is Dual Use for Business; Check Rental Agreement for Clarity. A discussion on the applicability of service tax on rent income from a residential property rented to a firm for its executive's residence. The key issue is whether the property is used solely for residential purposes or also for business, which affects tax liability. One expert advises examining the rental agreement to determine usage. If the property is used for both residential and business purposes, service tax may apply, and the firm could claim cenvat credit. If the property is solely for residential use, no service tax is due. It is recommended to pay service tax to avoid potential litigation. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Madhukar N Hiregange on Apr 19, 2008
There is no rent on residential accomodation. However if a residetnial property is used for commercial usage then there could be a doubt.
RAKESH R on Apr 20, 2008
In the above query, the residential property is given to a firm for the purpose of firm executive residence. To decide the applicability of service tax, we have to study the agreement between "A" and the "Firm" to ascertain the terms and conditions stipulated in the agreement. However, when the rent is paid by the Firm, a question arises as to whether the house is used exclusively for the purpose of residence OR is used for both official and residential purpose. If it is for both the purposes, then service tax is payable. The definition of the service clearly says "for use in the course of furtherence of business or commerce..". The Department may say, the rent paid by the firm to "A" is to accomodate the firm's executive as per the terms of the employment agreement between the firm and the executive as part of his salary and perks and as such, the renting is to be treated as "use in the course of furtherence of business. It is better advised to pay service tax to avoid litigation. The Firm can avail "cenvat credit" to the firm (provided the firm is a manufacturer or service provider). On the other hand, if the rent is paid by the executive itself directly to "A" based on rental agreement between "A" and the "executive" and inturn the employee gets reimbursement, it will not subject to service tax because, "A" has agreement with only 'the executive' and not with the Firm. Advised accordingly, S. Gokarnesan
Guest on Apr 21, 2008
If the building is solely used for residential purposes and agreement support the position, then there would be no service tax levy as the explanation clearly excludes 'building used solely for residential puposes...' from immovable property liable for tax.
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues