Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Applicability of rule 8(3) - as reversal of cenvat duty is not duty on removal of goods

sunil mehta

A small weaver opted to avail exemption under notn.no.30/2004 dt.9/7/04.The balance of cenvat duty on 8/7/04(budget day) in RG23 Pt.-II was rs.909/-.The cenvat duty in cl.stock of raw-mat.on 8//704 was rs.20333/-The bal.amt rs.19424 was paid through TR-6 challan on 24/12/04. The Asst.comm.has issued notice that interest on late payment of so called 'cenvat duty'(arisen as a result of revarsal of cenvat duty only)be paid as per rule 8(3) of Central Excise Rules [email protected]/-per day of default ant @ 13% p.a.u/s 11AB. qUERY:WHETHER aSST.COMM.IS JUSTIFIED IN APLLYING rule 8(3)?Since rule 8(3) states that 'any duty payable on removal of goods'.Now 'reversal of cenvat duty is not duty on removal of goods.Therefore,rule 8(3) does not apply abinitio.

Pl.discuss.

sunil v mehta

Weaver Challenges Interest Demand on Cenvat Duty Reversal; Rule 8(3) Misapplied Instead of Rule 9(2) A small weaver who opted for an exemption under a specific notification faced an issue regarding the reversal of Cenvat duty. The Assistant Commissioner issued a notice demanding interest on the late payment of Cenvat duty, citing Rule 8(3) of the Central Excise Rules, which applies to duties payable on the removal of goods. However, the reversal of Cenvat duty is not considered a duty on removal. A respondent clarified that the reversal should be under Rule 9(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, which does not require interest payment, making the Assistant Commissioner's action unjustified. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues