Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

mrp on packaged drinking water

sv bhasker

Packaged drinking water is classifiable under 22019090 of the First Schedule to CETA. Whereas the Notification No. 49/2008-CE(NT) prescribes abatement of 45% and 40% in respect of Mineral waters and aerated waters respectively. In absence of mention of pacakaged drinking water in the said Notification,will the assessment of packaged water to be done done under Section4 of CEA and not under Section 4A. Please advice with circulars, case laws if any.

Regards

Debate on Excise Duty for Packaged Drinking Water: Does It Meet Section 4A Criteria Under Central Excise Act? A discussion on the classification and excise duty assessment of packaged drinking water under the Central Excise Act. The initial query raised concerns about the correct section for assessment due to the absence of packaged drinking water in a specific notification. A respondent cited a Supreme Court judgment outlining factors for goods to fall under Section 4A, noting that packaged water doesn't meet all criteria, specifically the government notification requirement. Another participant clarified that the Legal Metrology Act has replaced the SWM Act, impacting the regulatory framework. The discussion focused on understanding applicable legal provisions and duties. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues