There is nothing specifically mentioned in the Mega Exemption Notification No. 25/2012 that whether exemptions mentioned in the said notification are compulsory or optional. But it alway better to go with the language/wordings of the Notification to get rid of any unwarranted situations which may occure in the future.
An exemption Notification should be construed stricly.
Exemption Notification should be read in its entity. Further, exemption notification has to be read strictly so far as the eligibility is concerned. Conditions stipulating therein cannot be ignored - CCE v Ginni Filaments (2005 (2) TMI 116 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) = 2005 (181) ELT 145 (SC 3 member bench).
When wording of a notification are clear, then the plain language of the notification must be given effect to. An interpretation which is not borne out by the plain wording of notification cannot be given effect to - Excon Bldg. Material Mfg. Co. P Ltd. v CCE (2005 (3) TMI 137 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) = 2005 (186) ELT 263 (SC 3 member bench).
Exemption notification has to be interpretated on its wording. No words, not used in the Notification, can be added - CCE v. Sunder Steels (2005 (2) TMI 117 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) = (181 ELT 154 ) (AIR 2005 SC 1307(SC 3 member bench).
When it is specifically mentioned in the notification that such services would not attract the service tax then why to block the Working Capital in the CENVAT credit account?