Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?
Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
In my opinion the same is liable from 19.4.2006 after the rules were put in place and Sec. 66A was inserted in the law books. Prior to that the insertion of explanation to Sec 65 (105) could be said to be illegal as an explanation cannot bring about a levy. However this requries a judicial confirmation. This is an import of servcie and not an export of service. therefore the export of services rules do not apply.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.