Just a moment...

Top
Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Provident Fund

krishna besta

 If provident fund was not paid with in the due date ie 15th of subsequent month. What are the consequences accoriding to PF act & Income Tax Act ?

If the PF amount paid after the due date is this allowable Expenditure of Employer Contribution for Companies.

Supreme Court Rulings: Provident Fund Contributions Deductible If Paid Before Tax Return Filing Date Under Section 43B. A query was raised regarding the consequences under the Provident Fund Act and Income Tax Act if provident fund contributions are not paid by the due date. Two responses referenced Supreme Court rulings. One cited the case of CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd., stating that employer contributions to ESI and EPF, even if paid after the due date but before filing the return, are deductible as expenditure under section 43B. Another response referenced the Vinay Cement case, affirming that contributions paid by the return filing due date under section 139(1) are allowable in the year the expenditure is incurred. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
ajay singh on Feb 22, 2012

Apex Court in the case of CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd. (2009 (11) TMI 27 - SUPREME COURT) where it has been held that if the employers contribute the ESI and EPF even when made after the due date under the aforesaid Acts but before filing of the return, section 43B is attracted and the said contribution is liable to be deducted as expenditure

Vivek Harsh on Feb 22, 2012

 Plain reading of Sec 43B makes it clear that if Employer contribution is paid on or before the due date of filing of retun under 139(1) the same shall be allowed in the year in which expenditure is incurred.

 Very recently Supreme Court in case of Vinay Cement(2007 (3) TMI 346 - Supreme Court of India) for Employees Contribution held, the same shall all be allowed if  paid on or before the due date of filing of retun under 139(1) the same shall be allowed in the year in which expenditure is incurred.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues