Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Circular No.79/9/2004-ST dated 17/09/2004

sarveshwar mundra

One of my client is a contractor doing civil construction work for Ordinance Factory.  According to aforesaid circular , Government constructions normally would not be taxable, if it is used for residential, office purpose or for providing civic amenities.  However, Superintendent, Service Tax insists for levying service tax  on construction works after an abatement of 67% on gross amount of contract works. kindly let me know the correct position of leviability of Service tax  on construction work of Ordinance Factory.

Contractor Disputes Service Tax on Government Construction Project, Questions Applicability Despite Superintendent's Abatement Proposal A contractor working on civil construction for an Ordinance Factory inquired about the applicability of service tax, citing a circular indicating government constructions used for residential, office, or civic amenities are typically not taxable. However, the Service Tax Superintendent insists on applying service tax after a 67% abatement on the contract's gross amount. One respondent clarified that the circular pertains to erection and commissioning activities, not the queried construction, and no exemption applies. Another respondent suggested that non-commercial government constructions should not attract service tax and advised questioning the superintendent's insistence if no formal demand was issued. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues