Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID : 3263
- 0 -

EXPORT WITHOUT UT-1

Date 10 Aug 2011
Replies10 Answers
Views 6188 Views
Asked By

Dear Sir,

A manufacturer exporter export the goods under UT-1 whareas there is no LUT filed to the AC/DC by the manufacturer, but exporter following all procedure like issue of ARE-1 under UT-1, Excise Inv. (duty not charged), and one is also defaulted that ARE-1 doesnt submitted within 24 hr to the juridictional authority. party had received currrency in bank and having proper Bank Realization Certificate (BRC) as per export invoice.

Note: Party is not availing CENVAT facility

What Should we do?

whether firm is liable to penal action?

does export proved once BRC got?

please guide more........     

10 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
- 0
Replied on Aug 10, 2011
1.

It seems that you didn't follow the correct procedure while exporting the goods out of country.  However, submit all the documentary evidences to the concerned authority and file an application to the Jurisdictional Commissioner of Central Excise by stating the all material facts.  Since the BRC is also produced as proof of export, therefore, the Jurisdictional commissioner may grant permission post facto or impose nominal penalty.

- 0
Replied on Aug 10, 2011
2.

This can be treated as procedural laps....

- 0
Replied on Aug 12, 2011
3.

What do you mean by the term Party is not availing CENVAT .. do you mean to say your product is not excisable?

- 0
Replied on Aug 12, 2011
4.

Party is not availing Cenvat Credit as their raw material is exempt, and the party is manufacturing Branded Goods and saling the goods in open market as well as export

- 0
Replied on Aug 12, 2011
5.

Non submission of ARE-1 in prescribed time can be managed, but if  products are excisable and your LUT not filed and endorsed by AC, you will face trouble. As per my understanding penalty in terms of Rule 25 (1)(a) of Central Excise Rules. Your BRC has nothing to do with procedure notified in terms of Notification No. 42/2001.

- 0
Replied on Aug 12, 2011
6.

You may also opt for compounding in terms of Compounding Rules 

 

Offence specified under section 9(1)(bb) of the Act

Upto fifty per cent of the amount of duty evasion, subject to minimum of ten per cent of duty evasion

- 0
Replied on Aug 19, 2011
7.

Theis can be reguralised with the help of Jurisdictional Authorities. This is merely a procedural laps...

- 0
Replied on Aug 20, 2011
8.

From the given information it appears that procedure under Rule 19 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 not followed. This procedural lapses, may be condonable.

- 0
Replied on Aug 20, 2011
9.

DEAR

 A MANUFACTURER CANNOT CLEAR THE GOODS WITHOUT PAYMENT OF DUTY OR  CAN EXPORT UNDER UT-1 OR AGAINST ANNEX-1 OR UNDER  CT-3 ( IF DEEMED EXPORT). CLEARING GOODS WITHOUT DUTY OR SUCH DOCT IS OFFENCE.

 RECEPT OF FOREIGN EXCHANGE IS NOT IMPORTANT IN ABOVE CASE.

 

 THNX/ B.B.PUROHIT

- 0
Replied on Aug 21, 2011
10.

My views were based on decision of Tribunal in the case of Commr of C. Ex. Versus Ambadi Enterprises Ltd where in it has been held that -

Export - Proof of export not produced - Procedure under Rule 18/19 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 not followed - Procedural lapses, condonable in terms of Tribunal’s decision in the case of T.I. Cycles of India 

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues