Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

notice u/s 271(1)(c)

Mayank Raval

Dear sirs.

My party has filled the return of income , comes under the scrutiny , in the matter A.O. found two points where he objected & made a addition to the matter.

Points are as under :

1. A.O. has demanded that my client has not ded. the TDS on source of the Loans taken from the Fin. Compnaies other than bank , here they have not made any TDS for the same.

2. My client has not given the effect of the cut off procedure for the expenditures to make proportion to the Prepaid Expenses in relation to the Insurance expenses and it involves Rs. 3 Lacs so here the A.O. has made the 60 % adhoc addition to the income.

Pls help me to resolve the case with some materials availabe to solve the matter.

Reagrds

Mayank 

Taxpayer Faces Additions for TDS and Prepaid Expenses; Possible Relief Under Section 271(1)(c) for No Intent to Evade A party filed an income tax return that was scrutinized by the Assessing Officer (A.O.), who raised two objections leading to additions. First, the client did not deduct TDS on loans from financial companies, not banks. Second, the client failed to proportion prepaid insurance expenses, resulting in a 60% adhoc addition to income. In response, an advisor suggested that relief might be possible under section 271(1)(c) if there was no intent to evade tax, as the additions were based on technical grounds, potentially allowing for the penalty to be waived. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues