Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID : 3106
- 0 -

notice u/s 271(1)(c)

Date 26 Jun 2011
Replies1 Answers
Views 7326 Views
Asked By

Dear sirs.

My party has filled the return of income , comes under the scrutiny , in the matter A.O. found two points where he objected & made a addition to the matter.

Points are as under :

1. A.O. has demanded that my client has not ded. the TDS on source of the Loans taken from the Fin. Compnaies other than bank , here they have not made any TDS for the same.

2. My client has not given the effect of the cut off procedure for the expenditures to make proportion to the Prepaid Expenses in relation to the Insurance expenses and it involves Rs. 3 Lacs so here the A.O. has made the 60 % adhoc addition to the income.

Pls help me to resolve the case with some materials availabe to solve the matter.

Reagrds

Mayank 

1 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
- 0
Replied on Jun 28, 2011
1.

Since your question is related to penalty u/s 271(1)(c), in my view, you can claim relief on the ground of banafide belief. If there is no intention to evade tax or concealment of income, no penalty under section 271(1)(c) be imposed. The addition has been made on technical grounds and the assessee has suffered for the same under different set of provisions, therefore, I hope that penalty would be waived off.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues