Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

APPLICABILITY OF TDS ON PAYMENT TO PATHOLOGY LAB

Guest

MY CLIENT PROVIDE SERVICES OF PATHOLOGY LAB TO ITS DIFFERENT INSTITUTION LIKE HOSPITALS, NURSING HOME ETC., ON MAKING PAYMENT BY THE PARTY - WHETHER TDS ON ITS WILL COVER UNDER section 194C OR 194J, FURTHER THE PATHOLOGY LAB ALSO TAKING SERVICES OF LAB TEST FROM DIFFERENT LAB - ITS ALSO PAID FOR THE TEST.... TDS U/S. 194c OR 194J PLEASE ADVICE

Debate on whether TDS for pathology lab payments falls under Section 194C or Section 194J of the Income Tax Act. A discussion was initiated regarding the applicability of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on payments to pathology labs, specifically whether these should fall under Section 194C or 194J of the Income Tax Act. One respondent suggested that if a contract involves intellectual skill, it should be covered under Section 194J; otherwise, Section 194C applies. Another respondent argued that since pathology reports require a qualified pathologist's signature, they should be considered under Section 194J, aligning with the broader medical profession. Both respondents shared their interpretations based on their professional experiences. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues