Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

80 IC-substantial expansion

shivani taneja
IF a Company was established after 2003 in baddi and has alresdy claimed dudction of 100% of Profits for last 5 years....can it again cliam deduction of 100% for another 5 years if it does substantial expanstion
Can companies in Baddi claim 100% profit deduction under Section 80IC after substantial expansion? Debate on limits and MAT. A discussion on a forum addresses whether a company established after 2003 in Baddi can claim a 100% profit deduction for another five years under Section 80IC if it undergoes substantial expansion. One participant affirms this possibility, while another argues that substantial expansion provisions do not apply to companies existing before the section's implementation to prevent repeated deductions. Another contributor notes a 10-year cap on deductions but finds no restriction on claiming 100% within that period. A reference to a Kolkata ITAT order is mentioned, and another participant confirms the possibility but notes the requirement to pay Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT). (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues