Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Proof of export

Akhilesh Chhaparwal

dear sir

we are export the material to SEZ unit under LUT and  ARE-1 filled. we get the  ARE-1 w duly signed by SEZ authorities. we sumbitted for Proof of export  but excise officers says the Bill of Export also required but our party do not want to issue the Bill of export so what to do?

Supplier Faces Legal Challenge Over Missing Bill of Export for SEZ Unit Dispatch Under SEZ Rules A party exporting materials to an SEZ unit under LUT and ARE-1 faced an issue with excise officers who demanded a Bill of Export, which their partner refused to provide. According to SEZ rules, a Bill of Export is mandatory when claiming export benefits. The party, acting as a supplier, dispatched goods with documents in the name of their partner, a merchant exporter. The authorities questioned the legality of this arrangement, suggesting it might constitute an offense since the party itself is not the exporter. The party seeks advice on how to proceed. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues