Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

TDS QUERY ?

CABIJENDERKUMAR BANSAL

X is a sole proprietor. F.y 09-10= Turnover 45 lakh F.y 08-09= Turnover 39 Lakh F.y 07-08= Turnover 50 lakh He has paid a royalty of Rs 35,000/- to a company on march 25, 2009 without deducted TDS. Disallowance U/s 40(a)(ia) is applicable in the case or not?

Sole proprietor faces disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for failing to deduct TDS on royalty payment. A sole proprietor, referred to as X, paid a royalty of Rs 35,000 to a company on March 25, 2009, without deducting TDS. The discussion revolves around whether the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) applies. The consensus among participants is that X should have deducted TDS because the turnover in the financial year 2007-08 exceeded Rs 40 lakh, making X liable for TDS in the financial year 2008-09. The application of Section 194J and the second proviso, which considers the turnover of the preceding year, supports this requirement. Failure to deduct TDS would attract disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia). (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues