For brain storming: Does the A.O. has jurisdiction and power to treat a 'capital asset' as stock-in-trade? In my view -no. Every property is a capital asset, except some excluded items. Whether,an item is stock-in-trade or not will depend on the basis of items for which any person is known as trader or dealer, so long he continue business as a trader, stockist, distributor or a person open to buy and sell such items he is dealer in such item and such items will be his stock-in-trade , in normal course of business. Pool of cars used to run on hire are capital asset, the same person may trade in cars, cars kept for selling are only his stock-in-trade. In cases where a person is not a trader of any item say shares , units, his holding will be capital assets, unless he has treated or converted such assets into stock-in-trade and S. 45(2) is attracted. The assesee has option u/s 45(2) to treat or convert a capital asset into stock-in-trade, but the AO has no such power or option. Sale of a 'capital asset' require computation under head' capital gains' and AO should not make it under head business. A person is engaged in business of cars, he purchases cars and is known as dealer of cars, - cars purchased by him will be his stock-in-trade in natural commercial way. He can treat some cars as his capital assets by transferring to fixed asset account. If he sells such a car (F/A)the computation will be under head 'capital gains'. If he again convert such a car (F/A) into stock-in-trade, then computation will be under head 'capital gains' and business income on application of S. 45(2). A furniture show room purchases furniture and is known as seller of furniture in market and commercial world, furniture purchased is his stock-in-trade in natural and commercial way, if he want to use some furniture for furnishing of showroom, or office he can either directly treat them as furniture (F/A)at point of purchase or can convert some of his stock in trade into furniture (F/A)
Capital asset- stock-in-trade
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Assessing Officer Cannot Reclassify Capital Asset as Stock-in-Trade; Taxpayer's Discretion Under Section 45(2) Prevails. The discussion addresses whether an Assessing Officer (AO) has the authority to classify a 'capital asset' as 'stock-in-trade' for tax purposes. The consensus is that the AO lacks this power. A capital asset is defined by its nature and the business activities of the owner. For instance, cars used for hire are capital assets, while cars for sale are stock-in-trade. A taxpayer can convert a capital asset into stock-in-trade under Section 45(2) of the Income Tax Act, but this is at the taxpayer's discretion, not the AO's. The computation of gains depends on the asset's classification and conversion. (AI Summary)